ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — New York lawmakers are considering whether to strip away pieces of the broad legal shield they gave nursing homes, hospitals and other healthcare facilities to fend off lawsuits and criminal prosecutions over coronavirus care.
The Democrat-led Legislature agreed to the wide-ranging protection in early April, when the virus was raging in New York.
But now, with the virus surge tamed and the state reckoning with the nation's highest death toll — more than 25,000 confirmed coronavirus fatalities statewide, including over 6,500 in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities — many lawmakers are having second thoughts.
A proposal that could pass the state Assembly as soon as Thursday would notably narrow the legal immunity provisions, though it doesn't go as far as some backers originally sought.
"This is a good step in restoring the rights of patients and nursing home residents while also protecting the frontline workers at healthcare facilities," said Assembly sponsor Ron Kim, a Queens Democrat who initially proposed a broader repeal of the protections. He said the current version would still hold healthcare facilities "accountable for failing to prevent the spread of COVID-19 or arranging for proper care of COVID patients."
Nursing homes and hospitals are fighting the proposal. Some say it could hamper care during potential future coronavirus surges that could again stretch health care to the limits, with volunteers and medical students caring for patients in makeshift hospitals.
"The public and the state expect these actions to be taken to meet the extraordinary needs of New Yorkers during a pandemic," Kenneth Raske, president of the influential Greater New York Health Association, wrote to lawmakers Tuesday. "These actions should be protected … Without them, it may be very difficult for hospitals, New York state and local governments to recruit highly skilled volunteers during future COVID-19 surges."
At least 15 states have provided health facilities and/or providers some safeguard from lawsuits arising from the coronavirus crisis, but New York went unusually far.
"There was a very wide immunity granted when the pandemic was at its peak in New York," said state Sen. Mike Gianaris, a Queens Democrat who supports narrowing the protections. "I think now we've learned a lot more, and we can make sure people are not harmed by their health systems and have recourses if they are."
The immunity measure woven into the state budget in April was drafted by Raske's group, which has spent millions on lobbying and political donations over the last few years.
The legislation was uncommon in applying to both lawsuits and criminal prosecutions during the COVID-19 emergency.
It allowed legal action for gross negligence, willful criminal misconduct and some other egregious misdeeds, but specified that staffing or equipment shortages wouldn't qualify.
Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's administration has said the measure was needed to get all the pieces of the health care system to work collaboratively in the crisis. Nursing home residents' advocates, plaintiffs' lawyers and some lawmakers said it made it too difficult to hold the homes accountable and benefited them at the expense of their vulnerable residents.
The new proposal leaves many of the protections intact. But it newly makes clear they apply only to care provided for COVID-19 itself, not to other problems that may happen to occur during the pandemic — a fall that injures a negligently monitored nursing home resident who doesn't have the virus, for example.
Supporters say the change would keep facilities from using the crisis to skirt responsibility for unrelated misdeeds. But a leader of a big New York nursing home group says it's shortsighted and unfair.
Staff and protective equipment shortages and testing limitations didn't affect virus patients alone, said Stephen Hanse, president of the New York State Health Facilities Association. He said the proposal "fails to understand the vast impacts this virus imposed upon all residents, staff and providers."
The proposal also makes changes that Kim said would allow for some lawsuits over care arrangements, such as hospitals releasing patients to nursing homes unprepared to care for them.
More than 6,300 recovering coronavirus patients were sent from hospitals to New York nursing homes during the height of the pandemic, under a now-reversed state policy that has engendered much debate. Among the points of contention: Some homes and industry groups have said facilities were overwhelmed but believed the policy compelled them to admit the patients, while Cuomo has said homes shouldn't have accepted the patients if unable to take proper care of them.
Asked Wednesday about the proposal to narrow health care facilities' legal protections, Cuomo said he "could see the rationale" for allowing suits over matters unrelated to coronavirus care but needed to see the details.
Care home residents' advocate Richard Mollot called the proposal "a step in the right direction."
"Nursing home residents deserve more — not less — protections from abuse and neglect," said Mollot, who runs the Long Term Care Community Coalition.
"care" - Google News
July 24, 2020 at 02:39AM
https://ift.tt/30HoCCV
NY may trim legal protections for care homes, hospitals - ModernHealthcare.com
"care" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2N6arSB
Shoes Man Tutorial
Pos News Update
Meme Update
Korean Entertainment News
Japan News Update
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "NY may trim legal protections for care homes, hospitals - ModernHealthcare.com"
Post a Comment